The only three Anti-Beatles sites on the web I have found is below. They are so retarded in what they say. If you go to the pages, you can see it for themselves. They make no point what so ever, and they are trying to hide behind things, like the truth.

1.) BeatleHater's Page - I hate the Beatles. Why don't you?

This person is gay. He likes prince. He admitts it. What a queer. HIS list of other music you can listen to is "There are so much great music to listen to! The Velvet Underground! John Cale solo! Roxy Music! The Stooges and/or Iggy! Parliment Funkadelic! Prince! Hole! New York Dolls! Buzzcocks! Ramones!" They are either queer, or no-namers. The person also said that The Beatles stole their music from The Rutles. Now how funny was that. The person also has a fake counter. What I mean was it keeps track of the hits, and it changes after every hit, but the person started the counter at over 9,500,000, so it says some huge number. If you believe that it is a real counter, you might just be as stupid, or ignorant as this person. Anyway, people who do go to this site, are people who like The Beatles, and just want to see his outlandish comments. Atleast this person admmits that The Beatles are very popular.

Mail bomb him at garrow@webtv.net.

This page thinks The Beatles are over-rated. It say's it in the opening paragraph:

"This page is dedicated to the most overrated band in rock & roll history. More overrated than the Stones, more than Led Zepplin, more than Michael Jackson, hell, even more overrated than Hootie and the Blowfish."

It has another fake counter, like the one mentioned above. It also has next to the counter "...pissed off fans since 3/24/96" which is correct, because everyone that goes there are Beatles fans, pissed off from that site. Another retarded comment the person made is below. Plus, on his FAQ sections, he admitts his excuse for a page took 1/2 hours to make. Mine took alot longer, and my page is just so much better. Hands down.

"By the way, the only Beatles picture on this page is the one above. I'm not going to waste your time with any more, and I'm certainly not going to use up valuable server space on that sh**. I've also rearranged the order of the "least talented Beatle" since some Beatle fans were confused on the way it was presented. I have assumed too much in thinking they could read plain English."

First of all, he/she has plenty of space to put up pictures. Another fuuny site (sarcastic). This person is so smart (sarcastic). This person thinks his site is actually good. Now that is funny, because his site is one of the worst site's on the internet, let alone a Anti- Beatles page. Below are quotations from his page, about HIS worst Beatles list.

The first quote is about Ringo.

"Ringo is obviously the least talented. How the hell did this guy get the job? Were the other three so f***ed up at the time that Ringo actually sounded good to them?" And another quote from his page is "Talk about a white guy with no rhythm. Hell, a random search of the London pubs would result in a better drummer."

Well first of all, he keeps the beat, and the rythm fine. He is not "choppy" when he plays. He is a good drummer. What I want to know is what this person thinks is a good drummer.

Next quote is about Paul AND Linda McCartney

"Paul and Linda's "I know what's best so I'm not going to serve meat at my concert" sh** definitely brings them up to second place." And later in the paragraph, "Anyone can write a song in 4/4 time with 3 or 4 chords. At least one of them is history now. Apparently that clean living didn't quite work out as planned."

First, Linda is not a Beatle, but she is mentioned like one. Second they are vegetarians. I am not, but this is not about me. Also, how does not eating meat and being a songwriter have anything to do with each other. He never refers to it in his songs, so this person's web page is just retarded. Yes, Paul is in history now, in the Guinness Book of world records many times, The Rock and Roll Hall of Fame, and with Billions of people around the world. And what does this person mean by clean living? I only understand sentences with meanings. I have a few word's to describe him. Inferiority, Ignorant, and Retarded. If songs like Paul's are so easy to write, why isn't the person doing the same, and being as popular as Paul.

Next quote is about George

"That "Set on you" bit a few years back almost had George beat out Paul on the list. One or two more of those and he'll definitely take the title."

That is it. How short. George is one of the best guitarist's in the world. He wrote "Here Comes the Sun," "While My Guitar Gently Weeps," and many more. I have never heard about "Set on You," but if he did write it, it was not a Beatles songs, and those don't count, since the last time I checked, this was/ is/ and will always be a Beatles site.

The last quote is about John

"John is probably the least least talented. I won't say the most talented, because that would imply some sort of talent actually existed. But at least he had enough respect to get himself killed, so we don't have to worry about any more sh** coming from this one (or do we?)."

Another short quote. Funny, because he was inducted in the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame, TWICE. He is only 1 of the 2 people who has ever done that. The other one? Paul McCartney. Isn't that a kick in the face for all the Anti-Beatles pages. Once for The Beatles, and one for his solo years. He also was trajically shot in the head. He did not ask to die, or anything like that. His killer is up for parole in December of 2000 in NY, but I have heard about a big rally who will protest (he recieved 20 years to life). He won't get paroled anyway, for his saftey, and his mental state. He was so crazy, he stayed at The Dakota building where it happened, and was reading "Catcher in the Rye." I am sure, that if he was released, he would be killed within 6 months. He has a death wish, that is going to follow himself to the grave. And anyway, some of John's solo album's are almost as good as The Beatles albums. Everyone hope's that more music will come from him, and everyone was blessed with the John Lennon Anthologies.

The last thing that I have to say about the person's horrible site has a disclamer to his e-mail. The person doesn't want Beatles fan's to tell him truth. We don't hide behind lies. Read his disclamer. It's Retarded.

Mail bomb him at rareddy@globalbiz.net

This page says that the beatles stole songs and riffs from some little bands. It is such BS. It has no conclusive arguments that it happened. Also, the page thinks that The Beatles are not selling any music anymore. How retarded is this person. They have sold more music than any other person or group ever. Also, it says that The Beatles concert in Shea Stadium had 11,000 empty seats. While this is true, what about the other roughly 50,000 seats that they did sell. Also, The Beatles were the first group that played at a outdoor stadium. In addition they sold out plenty of stadiums back then, which was unprecidented at the time.

Mail bomb him at dragusa@earthlink.net.

Click on the glove to head back to the Main Page!